Feather evolution

Among the various integumentary structures of vertebrates, feathers are the most complex. Feathers are unique in their complex branching and impressive variation in size, shape, color, and texture (Prum 1999, Prum and Williamson 2001; Figure 1). Feathers were long considered the defining anatomical feature of birds. However, many specimens of non-avian dinosaurs have been discovered in China that show that feathers are not restricted to birds (Figure 2). Specifically, most non-avian coelurosaurian theropods appeared to have feathers, with coelurosaurs being relatively small (2 – 3 m long), carnivorous dinosaurs that occurred from the mid-Triassic through the early Jurassic (230 – 200 million years ago).

Figure 1. The two basic feather types are pennaceous and plumulaceous (or downy). Both types have a calamus. The pennaceous feather also has a rachis (or shaft) from which branches the barbs. Branching off of the barbs (upper right) are barbules. The hooklets of the barbules on the distal side of barbs interlock with the barbules on the proximal side of adjacent barbs. The ‘interlocked’ barbs on each side of the rachis form the feather vanes. The plumulaceous feather has numerous non-interlocked barbs extending from the calamus (From: Prum and Brush 2003).

In taxa more distantly related to birds, such as Sinosauropteryx (Figure 3 below), multiple tufts projecting a few millimeters from the skin have been discovered that resemble hypothesized early stages in avian feather development. These filamentous ‘feathers’ (or ‘protofeathers’; there is some disagreement concerning whether or not these integumentary structures were true feathers, e.g., Unwin 1998, Lingham-Soliar et al. 2007) were about 20 (5-40) mm long and appear to be rather homogenous over the body rather than originating in specific tracts. To some investigators, the filaments appear to be like down feathers and were probably used for insulation. They were hollow, and appeared to have a short shaft with barbs, but no barbules. In 2009, a fossil of another feathered dinosaur, Beipiaosaurus (a coelurosaurian theropod), with even simpler feathers was reported (Xu et al. 2009; Figures 4 and 5 below). These feathers consisted of single broad (about 2 mm wide) filament, were 10 to 15 centimeters long, and only present on the head, neck and tail. In taxa more closely related to birds, such as the oviraptorid Caudipteryx and dromaeosaurid Sinornithosaurus, elongate pinnate wing and tail feathers, structurally identical to the feathers of present-day birds and comprised of a central rachis, branching barbs, and barbules, have been found. In addition, fossils of a Dromaeosaurid (Microraptor) have revealed asymmetrically veined pennaceous feathers on both the forelimbs and hindlimbs (Clarke and Middleton 2006).

Figure 3. Restoration of a Sinosauropteryx (Sinosauropteryx prima) with its body covered with feathers that were likely important for thermoregulation
(From: Chuong et al. 2001, and based on Chen et al. 1998).

Figure 4. The elongated, single filament feathers of Beipiaosaurus. The yellow arrows point to feathers on the head and neck (right) and tail (above)
(From: Xu et al. 2009).

Figure 5. Artist’s conception of Beipiaosaurus, a dinosaur with broad, single-filament feather
(Image: Zhao Chuang and Xing Lida; source: http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2009/01/13/to-attract-mates-this-dino-may-have-shaken-a-tail-feather/).

Cladogram illustrating the relationship of birds with major groups of non-avian coelurosaurian theropods. The numbers in circles at each branching node indicate the first appearance of feathers and other key morphological characters. 1, unbranched feathers; 2, uncinate processes on ribs; 3, true branched feathers; 4, retroverted pubis; 5, reversed hallux; 6, asymmetrical flight feathers; 7, pygostyle; 8, horny beak; 9, alula (bastard wing); 10, large, keeled sternum. Taxa indicated with an asterisk are known to have possessed either protofeathers or true feathers (From: Zhou et al. 2003).

Preserved evidence of archosaurian body covering

The earliest preserved scales, filaments, or feathers are from the late Jurassic; the earliest crown clade bird with feathers is from the Paleocene. Filamentous feather precursors may have originated nearly 100 million years before the origin of flight, but very few fossil deposits sample this period. Sexual dimorphism in plumage and color patterning in Late Jurassic and Early Cretaceous dinosaurs suggest that display functions played a key role in the early evolution of pinnate feathers (Source: Clarke 2013).

Because birds evolved from reptiles and the integument of present-day reptiles (and most extinct reptiles including most dinosaurs) is characterized by scales, early hypotheses concerning the evolution of feathers began with the assumption that feathers developed from scales, with scales elongating, then growing fringed edges and, ultimately, producing hooked and grooved barbules (Figure 6 below). The problem with that scenario is that scales are basically flat folds of the integument whereas feathers are tubular structures. A pennaceous feather becomes ‘flat’ only after emerging from a cylindrical sheath (Prum and Brush 2002). In addition, the type and distribution of protein (keratin) in feathers and scales differ (Sawyer et al. 2000). The only feature shared by feathers and scales is that they both begin development as a morphologically distinct placode – an epidermal thickening above a condensation, or congregation, of dermal cells (see Figure 8 below). Feathers, then, are not derived from scales, but, rather, are evolutionary novelties with numerous unique features, including the feather follicle, tubular feather germ (an elevated area of epidermal cells), and a complex branching structure (Prum and Brush 2002; Figure 7 below).

Figure 6. Hypothetical intermediate stage in the evolution of feathers from scales, with ‘cracks’ separating sections of a large scales into smaller, lateral plates, or protobarbs (From: Regal 1975).

Feathers are branched structures. The main branch of a typical feather is the rachis, and barbs, consisting of a barb ramus and projections called barbules, branch off the rachis (Figure above from Prum and Brush 2003). Feathers grow from the base and the different branches are generated by various mechanisms in the feather follicle. Feather growth depends on nutrients provided via the follicular cavity (dermal pulp), and the feather structure develops on the follicular (or follicle) collar (inner epidermal layer; Figure 8 below). The production of the complex branched structure involves the interaction of several processes of cellular differentiation that occurs on the follicle collar (Calcott 2009). Among present-day birds, variation in the shape and structure of the rachis, barbs, and barbules generates a variety of feather types, including flight (contour) feathers, semiplumes, bristles, down feathers, filoplumes, and powder downs (Figure 7 below).

Figure 7. Various types of feathers of present-day birds, including the contour feather (left) plus filoplumes, semiplumes, down feathers, and bristles
(From: Lucas and Stettenheim 1972).

Figure 8. Schematic diagram of the development of a feather follicle. (A) Development of the epidermal feather placode and the dermal condensation. (B) Development of a feather papilla (or elongate feather bud) via the proliferation of dermal cells. (C) Formation of the feather follicle by the invagination of a cylinder of epidermal tissue around the base of the feather papilla. (D) Cross-section of the feather follicle as indicated by the dashed line in C. The follicle consists of a series of tissue layers (from peripheral to central), including the dermis of the follicle, the epidermis of the follicle (outer epidermal layer), the follicle cavity or lumen (the space between epidermal layers), the follicle (epidermal) collar (or inner epidermal layer), and the dermal pulp (tissue at the center of the follicle). The proliferation of feather keratinocytes and most of the growth of the feather occurs in the follicle, or epidermal, collar (From: Prum 1999).

Pennaceous feather development

Downy feather development

Evolutionary Interactions of Feather Molt in Birds by Ryan Terrill

Ryan Terrill studies the evolution of bird molt, an adaptation that allows birds to drop and regrow worn feathers each year. Annual molt is essential for survival of birds and is the only event of the annual cycle found in all individual birds, yet the fundamental nature of its variation is unknown. Birds face a trade-off between immediate need for a feather and resources available for regrowth, which has led to the evolution of a diversity of patterns and sequences of feather replacement. Dr. Terrill uses phylogenetic comparative analyses combined with molt, phenotype, ecology, and spatial data to investigate how and why birds have evolved such a diverse array of molt strategies.

Based on fossil evidence, we know that the first non-avian theropods with simple, single-filament feathers lived about 190 million years ago, and that non-avian theropods with feathers having a complex branching structure like those of present-day birds (pennaceous feathers) existed about 135 million years ago. This fossil evidence raises two important questions. First, if not derived from scales, how did feathers evolve and, second, how did simple, single-filament feathers evolve to become much more complex pennaceous feathers? Of course, a related question is, given that non-avian theropods did not fly, what function or functions did these feathers serve?

Both fossil and developmental evidence suggests that feathers evolved through a series of transitional stages, each the result of a developmental evolutionary novelty or, in other words, a new mechanism of growth (Prum 1999, Prum and Brush 2002, 2003). The first feathers, like those of Beipiaosaurus , were unbranched, hollow cylinders that developed from the tubular elongation (the feather germ) of a placode (Figure 9 below). The advantage of a tubular feather germ is that growth of a structure (in this case, a feather) can occur without an increase in the size of the skin itself (in contrast to, for example, scales; Prum 2005). An important step in the evolution of the first feathers was a change in characteristics of the placode. Both scales and feathers begin development from placodes, but feather development, in contrast to scale development, requires generation of suprabasal cell populations (dermal condensations) to form the follicle (see Figure 8 above). The development of placodes where dermal condensations occur, an evolutionary novelty, required changes in gene expression and timing. However, such changes are known to be an important mechanism in the origin of morphological innovations in many other organisms (True and Carroll 2002, Prum 2005).

Figure 9. The first feathers were likely hollow cylinders (Stage I) with undifferentiated collars that developed from an evolutionary novel follicle collar
(From: Prum and Brush 2003).

Based on Prum’s (1999) model of feather evolution, the next step after the origin of the feather follicle was the differentiation of the follicle collar into barb ridges to generate barbs (Stage II; Figure 10 below). The resulting feather would consist of a tuft of barbs extending from the calamus (Figure 10 below). Such a feather is hypothesized to have evolved before the origin of the rachis (Stage IIIA) because the rachis is initially formed by the fusion of barb ridges. In addition, barbs are hypothesized to evolve before barbules because barbules develop within layers of pre-existing barb ridges (Prum 1999). Feathers comparable in structure to hypothesized Stage II feathers have been reported from fossils of non-avian theropods, such as Sinornithosaurus mellenii (Figures 11 and 12 below; Xu et al. 2001, Norell and Xu 2005).

Figure 10. The next step in feather evolution (Stage II) involved the differentiation of the follicle collar into barb ridges to generated unbranched barbs (From: Prum and Brush 2003).

Figure 11. Filamentous integumental structure of Sinornithosaurus millenii with compound structures composed of multiple filaments. These structures exhibit two types of branching structure unique to avian feathers: the filaments are joined in a basal tuft, and the filaments are joined at their bases in series along a central filament. a, Arrows indicate the distal tips of some component filaments . b , Illustrated reconstruction of the appendage showing the positions of the observed filaments (lines) and the inferred outline of the appendage (shading). Asterisk, the proximal end of the appendage. The curved position of the appendage reveals its compound structure. Each filament converges on the center of the appendage at its base. Scale bar, 5 mm (From: Xu et al. 2001).

Figure 12. Sinornithosaurus millenii , based on this skeletal drawing by Marco Auditore and others
(Source: Wikipedia; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sinornithosaurus.jpg).

Line drawing of reconstructed skull of Sinornithosaurus. The skull is approximately 75 mm long.
vg, venom groove; mxf, maxillary fang; sff, subfenestral fossa; fc, fossa canal.

The birdlike raptor Sinornithosaurus was venomous -- Evidence suggests that some of the most avian dromaeosaurs, such as Sinornithosaurus, were venomous. These raptors had unusual dentition and other cranial features including grooved teeth, a possible pocket for venom glands, and a groove leading from that pocket to the exposed bases of the teeth. The anterior maxillary teeth are so long and fanglike that these raptors appear to be saber-toothed. The long maxillary teeth do not appear to have been deeply inserted into the prey; the grooved fang would probably have penetrated 4 to 6 mm into the skin. This would be sufficient to cut into the subdermal tissue and allow poison to enter the bloodstream but would be too shallow to cause death or immobilization through trauma alone. The poison of Sinornithosaurus may have been similar in properties to rear-fanged snakes in that it did not kill the envenomated animal quickly but rather placed it into a rapid state of shock These features are all analogous to the venomous morphology of lizards. Sinornithosaurus and related dromaeosaurs probably fed on the abundant birds of the Jehol forests during the early Cretaceous in northeastern China (Source: Gong et al. 2010).

The next step in feather evolution could have involved either the development of a rachis via fusion of barbs or the development of barbules that branched from the tufts of barbs. Perrichot et al. (2008) discovered feathers from the Early Cretaceous (and preserved in amber; Figure 15 below) that had shafts (rachis) consisting of incompletely fused, still distinguishable, partially superimposed barbs. This represents an intermediate stage between Prum’s (1999) stages II and IIIa and suggests the possibility that rachis development may have preceded barbule development (Figures 13 and 14 below).

Figure 13. Hypothesized stages I–III of feather evolution. Stage I of this model assumes an unbranched, hollow filament, which developed from a cylindrical invagination of the epidermis around a papilla. In stage II, a tuft was formed by fusion of several filaments at their bases. Stage III represents the formation of a central rachis and development of serially fused barbs (III A) — to which, at a slightly later stage (III B), secondary barbs (barbules) were added. The two other stages, IV (bipinnate feathers with elaborate barbules and a closed vane) and V (the asymmetrical flight feathers of modern flying birds), are not shown (From: Sues 2001).

Figure 14. The next step in feather evolution (Stage III) could have involved either the development of a rachis via fusion of barbs (3a) or the development of barbules that branched from the tufts of barbs (3b; From: Prum and Brush 2003). The discovery of feathers from the Early Cretaceous that had shafts (rachis) consisting of incompletely fused, still distinguishable, partially superimposed barbs suggests that that rachis development (3a) may have preceded barbule development (3b).

Figure 15. Three-dimensional virtual reconstruction of a fossil feather from the Early Cretaceous (about 100 million years ago) preserved in amber. This feather could be from either a bird or a non-avian theropod. (a-c) long barbs form two vanes on each side of a relatively flattened shaft; (d) the shaft is flattened and composed of incompletely fused bases of the barbs, a stage in feather evolution that was hitherto unknown in fossil records and corresponding to an intermediate stage between the very distinct stages II and IIIa defined by Prum (1999). Scale bars, 100 µm (From: Perrichot et al. 2008).

With the development of the rachis, the next stage in feather evolution would likely have been the development of barbules (without hooklets) to generate a bipinnate, open pennaceous structure (Stage 3a + b; Figure 16 below). Subsequent evolution of differentiated proximal and distal barbules would then generate the first closed, pennaceous vane, with distal barbules growing hooklets to attach to the simpler, grooved proximal barbules of the adjacent barb (Stage 4; Figure 16 below). Finally, lateral displacement of the new barb locus by differential new barb ridge addition to each side of the follicle led to the growth of a closed pennaceous feather with an asymmetrical vane resembling modern remiges (Stage 5; Figure 16 below).

Figure 16. Hypothesized final stages in the evolution of feathers like those of modern-day birds. T he development of barbules (without hooklets) generated a bipinnate, open pennaceous feather (Stage 3a + b), and evolution of differentiated proximal and distal barbules led to the first closed, pennaceous vane, with some barbules having hooklets to firmly attach to grooved barbules of the adjacent barb (Stage 4). Differential new barb ridge addition to each side of the follicle then led to the development of a closed pennaceous feather with an asymmetrical vane (Stage 5) (From: Prum and Brush 2003).

Fossils reveal that the plumage sported by young Similicaudipteryx, especially on the forelimbs and tail,
was substantially different from that adorning older relatives (Credit: Xing Lida and Song Qijin).

Ontogenetic development of early feathers -- Recent discoveries of feathered dinosaur specimens have greatly improved our understanding of the origin and early evolution of feathers, but little information is available on the ontogenetic development of early feathers. Xu et al. (2010) described an early juvenile specimen and a late-juvenile specimen, both referable to the oviraptorosaur Similicaudipteryx, recovered from the Lower Cretaceous (~125 million years ago) of western Liaoning, China. The two specimens have strikingly different remiges and rectrices, suggesting that a radical morphological change occurred during feather development, as is the case for modern feathers. However, both the remiges and the rectrices are proximally ribbon-like in the younger specimen, but fully pennaceous in the older specimen, a pattern not known in any modern bird. In combination with the wide distribution of proximally ribbon-like pennaceous feathers and elongate broad filamentous feathers among extinct theropods, this find suggests that early feathers were developmentally more diverse than modern ones and that some developmental features, and the resultant morphotypes, have been lost in feather evolution.

Many dinosaurian groups, such as most ornithischians, the sauropodomorphs and the basal theropods, are not included in this simplified dinosaurian cladogram. The available specimens suggest that members of these groups had scaly skin, but the possibility that they are partially covered by filamentous integumentary structures cannot be completely excluded. Preservational factors make it difficult to observe the detailed structure of the filamentous feathers in available specimens of compsognathids, tyrannosauroids, and therizinosauroids, so a ‘?’ is used to indicate uncertainty regarding the presence of morphotypes 1, 3, 4 and 5 in these groups. On the basis of the anatomical, ontogenetic, and phylogenetic distribution patterns of known feather morphotypes among non-avian dinosaurs and early birds, morphotypes 1, 2 and 7 are inferred to have been lost in feather evolution, along with their associated developmental mechanisms.

Feather evolutionary-developmental model, terminology, and stage I and II specimens from Canadian amber. (A) Current evolutionary-developmental model for feathers consists of a stage I morphology characterized by a single filament: This unfurls into a tuft of filaments (barbs) in stage II. In stage III, either some tufted barbs coalesce to form a rachis (central shaft) (IIIa), or barbules (segmented secondary branches) stem from the barbs (IIIb); then, these features combine to produce tertiary branching (IIIa+b). Barbules later differentiate along the length of each barb, producing distal barbules with hooklets at each node to interlock adjacent barbs and form a closed pennaceous (vaned) feather (stage IV). Stage V encompasses a wide range of additional vane and subcomponent specializations. Most modern birds possess stage IV or V feathers or secondary reductions from these stages Green, calamus or equivalent; blue, barbs; purple, rachis; red, barbule internodes; d.b., distal barbules; r., ramus; p.b., proximal barbules. (B) Field of filaments cut obliquely (stage I). (C) Filament clusters variably oriented (stage II). (D) Close-up of (C), showing filaments that comprise clusters. Pigmentation coupled with comparatively thick outer walls produces darker color than in isolated filaments. Scale bars, (B) and (C) 1 mm, and (D) 0.1 mm (From: McKellar et al. 2011).

Late Cretaceous dinosaur and bird feathers in Canadian amber -- The fossil record of early feathers has relied on carbonized compressions that lack fine structural detail. Specimens in amber are preserved in greater detail, but they are rare. Late Cretaceous coal-rich strata from western Canada provide the richest and most diverse Mesozoic feather assemblage yet reported from amber. The fossils described by McKeller et al. (2011) include primitive structures closely matching the protofeathers of nonavian dinosaurs, offering new insights into their structure and function. A Stage I feather (B in the figure above) contains a dense forest of regularly spaced, flexible filaments; the closest morphological match is the filamentous covering found of nonavian dinosaurs such as the compsognathid Sinosauropteryx prima. A Stage II morphotype (C and D in the figure above) consists of tight clusters composed of filaments; the most morphologically comparable compression fossils are protofeathers associated with the dromaeosaurid Sinornithosaurus millenii.

Other feathers have barbules specialized for discrete functions. In A, B, and C above, a thickened rachis is surrounded by numerous barbules with tightly coiled bases. The barbules undergo three or more complete whorls and are composed of semi-flattened internodes separated by weakly expanded node. Modern seedsnipes and sandgrouse possess belly feathers with similar basal barbule coiling, allowing water to be retained for transport to the nest for distribution to nestlings or for cooling incubating eggs. Grebes also have coiled barbules that absorb water into plumage, facilitating diving by modifying buoyancy, reducing hydrodynamic turbulence, and improving insulation. Barbules displaying all characteristics necessary for forming vaned feathers are also present in Canadian amber (D, E, and F above). These were probably borne by an animal capable of flight. Barbules are widely spaced along a thick ramus (barb shaft) adapted for rigidity and are strongly differentiated to interlock with adjacent barbs to form a vane. On the basis of the presence of a rachis and differentiated barbules, these feathers can be assigned conservatively to stages IV and V and are attributed to Late Cretaceous birds. These amber-preserved feathers demonstrate that numerous evolutionary stages were present in the Late Cretaceous, and that plumage already served a range of functions in both dinosaurs and birds.

Early functional hypotheses for the origin of feathers focused on their importance for flight (Steiner 1917, Heilmann 1926). However, the discovery of filamentous (and pennaceous) feathers on flightless non-avian theropods provides clear evidence that feathers evolved before the origin of flight and that the first feathers did not serve an aerodynamic function. The earliest tuft-like feathers could have served a variety of functions, including insulation, heat shielding (Regal 1975), communication (Mayr 1960), crypsis (Prum 1999), water repellency (Dyck 1985), and defense (Prum 1999).

The first cylindrical, filamentous feathers (Stage I) could have provided insulation if they were sufficiently numerous. Feathers similar in morphology to that predicted for Stage I feathers have been found on fossils of Beipiaosaurus (a coelurosaurian theropod; Xu et al. 2009). These primitive feathers consisted of single broad (about 2 mm wide) filaments, about 10 to 15 centimeters long, and were only present on the head, neck and tail. Given their morphology and distribution on the body, these feathers likely did not serve a thermoregulatory function. Rather, their localized distribution and morphology (relatively long and probably rather stiff) suggest that they served as display structures (Xu et al. 2009). However, other types of filamentous feathers in non-avian theropods more likely served a thermoregulatory function (Norell and Xu 2005). For example, the presence of dense filamentous feathers on Sinosauropteryx suggests these theropods were endothermic, and that heat retention was the primary function of the feathers (Chen et al. 1998; Figure 17 below).

Figure 17. a. Fossil of Sinosauropteryx prima. b , Drawing of skeleton and feathers along the dorsal side and tail. Dark pigmentation in the abdominal region might be some soft tissues of the viscera (From: Chen et al. 1998).

The fossil of a pigeon-sized theropod, Epidexipteryx hui, found in sediments from the Middle to Late Jurassic (152 - 168 million years ago) of northern China revealed two pairs of elongate ribbon-like tail feathers that probably served as ornaments (although they could have also helped E. hui maintain balance when moving along tree branches; Figure 18 below). These long feathers had a central shaft (rachis) but, unlike the rectrices of present-day birds, the vanes were not branched into individual filaments. Rather, they consisted of a single ribbon-like sheet. Shorter feathers also covered the body and could have served as insulation (Zhang et al. 2008). At present, Epidexipteryx is the oldest theropod known to have feathers that apparently served a display function.

Figure 18. Artists’ conception of Epidexipteryx hui showing the paired ribbon-like tail feathers that likely served as ornaments and played a role in intra- and intersexual interactions. Illustration Credit: Zhao Chuang, Xing Lida/Nature.

Pennaceous (or contour) feathers have been reported for a number of theropods, including the maniraptor Protarchaeopteryx (early Cretaceous; 120-122 million years ago), the oviraptorid Caudipteryx, and the dromaeosaurids Sinornithosaurus and Microraptor gui. Both Protarchaeopteryx and Caudipteryx had pennaceous feathers (with barbules) on the forearms and tail (as well as semiplumes and down-like feathers on the rest of the body). However, the arms of these small theropods (about 0.4-0.7 kg) were relatively short and all pennaceous feathers were symmetrical, indicating that these dinosaurs could not fly or glide effectively. Some investigators have suggested that these theropods, with relatively long legs and an elevated hallux, were ground-dwelling runners (Qiang et al. 1998). However, the forelimbs of Protarchaeopteryx and Caudipteryx, although short relative to their hindlimbs, were longer than those of other theropods and some investigators have argued that such elongation (along with other characteristics, including recurved claws) suggests a more (but not exclusive) arboreal lifestyle. For example, Chatterjee and Templin (2004) argued that these theropods were largely arboreal and that their small ‘protowings’ (in combination with the pennaceous feathers on the tail) enhanced arboreal maneuvering and permitted parachuting from branch to branch or from branch to ground (Figure 19 below). Feathers on the ‘protowings’ and tail would increase drag when parachuting and, to some extent, slow the rate of descent, permitting a safer landing. Another possible function of the forearm feathers is that could have been used to increase hindlimb traction in the same manner that some present-day birds, such as Chukar Partridges (Alectoris chukar), flap their wings to improve hindlimb traction when they climb inclined surfaces like the trunk of a tree (i.e., wing-assisted incline running; Dial 2003, Clarke and Middleton 2006).

Figure 19. Although incapable of powered flight, the pennaceous feather of Protarchaeopteryx may have permitted parachuting, whereas those of Sinornithosaurus likely permitted gliding (From: Chatterjee and Templin 2004).

Other small theropods from the early Cretaceous (124-128 million years ago), including Sinornithosaurus and M. gui, had both plumulaceous and pennaceous feathers. Sinornithosaurus weighed about 1.5 kg, were likely arboreal, and, in contrast to Protarchaeopteryx and Caudipteryx, their forelimbs were as long as their hindlimbs (Figure 12 above) . The longer wings and greater wing surface area, in combination with feathers on the tail (Figure 19 above), may have allowed Sinornithosaurus to glide between perches and from elevated perches to the ground (Chatterjee and Templin 2004).

M. gui was covered by plumulaceous feathers about 25–30 mm long and feathers on the top of the head were up to 40 mm long. Some feathers on the head were pennaceous and probably served a display function. Large, asymmetric pennaceous feathers were also attached to the distal tail, forelimb, and, surprisingly, the hindlimb. Microraptor had both primary and secondary flight feathers. This pattern was mirrored on the hind legs, with flight feathers attached to the upper foot bones as well as the upper and lower leg. When first described, Xu et al. (2003) proposed that Microraptor was arboreal and glided from tree to tree with four ‘wings’ – two forelimb wings and two hindlimb wings. However, Xu et al. (2003) proposed that the legs extended out to the side (Figure 20 below) and other investigators pointed out that such a leg position was unlikely because no known bird or theropod could extend their legs in such a manner without dislocating the hip joint (Padian 2003). Thereafter, Chatterjee and Templin (2007) proposed that the wings of Microraptor gui would have been split-level (like a biplane) and not spread as originally proposed, with the hindlimb flight feathers extending horizontally and able to generate lift along with the forelimb wings (Figure 21 below). Microraptor most likely employed a phugoid (from the Greek, meaning take flight) style of gliding flight - launching itself from a perch, swooping downward in a deep U-shaped curve, and moving upward to land on a perch in another tree (Figure 21 below).

Figure 20. A reconstruction of Microraptor gui in gliding flight (Xu et al. 2003).

Gliding flight of the four-winged Microraptor gui -- Fossils of the remarkable dromaeosaurid Microraptor gui and relatives clearly show well-developed flight feathers on the hind limbs as well as the front limbs. No modern vertebrate has hind limbs functioning as independent, fully developed wings; so, lacking a living example, little agreement exists on the functional morphology or likely flight configuration of the hindwing. Using a detailed reconstruction based on the actual skeleton of one individual, cast in the round, Alexander et al. (2010) developed light-weight, three-dimensional physical models and performed glide tests with anatomically reasonable hindwing configurations. Models were tested with hindwings abducted and extended laterally, as well as with a previously described biplane configuration. Although the hip joint requires the hindwing to have at least 20° of negative dihedral (anhedral), all configurations were quite stable gliders. Glide angles ranged from 3° to 21° with a mean estimated equilibrium angle of 13.7°, giving a lift to drag ratio of 4.1:1 and a lift coefficient of 0.64. The abducted hindwing model’s equilibrium glide speed corresponds to a glide speed in the living animal of 10.6 m·s⁻¹. Although the biplane model glided almost as well as the other models, it was structurally deficient and required an unlikely weight distribution (very heavy head) for stable gliding. The model with laterally abducted hindwings represents a biologically and aerodynamically reasonable configuration for this four-winged gliding animal. M. gui’s feathered hindwings, although effective for gliding, would have seriously hampered terrestrial locomotion.

Microraptor preys on birds -- Preserved indicators of diet are extremely rare in the fossil record; even more so is unequivocal direct evidence for predator–prey relationships. O'Connor et al. (2011) report a unique specimen of the small nonavian theropod Microraptor gui from the Early Cretaceous Jehol biota, China, which has the remains of an adult enantiornithine bird preserved in its abdomen, most likely not scavenged, but captured and consumed by the dinosaur. This provides direct evidence for the dietary preferences of Microraptor and a nonavian dinosaur feeding on a bird. Further, because Jehol enantiornithines were distinctly arboreal, in contrast to their cursorial ornithurine counterparts, this fossil suggests that Microraptor may have hunted in trees, supporting inferences that this taxon was also an arborealist and providing further support for the arboreality of basal dromaeosaurids.

Photograph and line drawing of a Microraptor gui fossil with remains of its avian prey shown in blue.

Figure 21. Top, teconstruction of M. gui in dorsal view (left) showing the morphology and distribution of hindlimb feathers and orientation of the hindlimb bones (above) during gliding. Above right, cross-section showing relative position of forelimb and hindlimb wings during gliding flight. Below right, a typical staggered biplane (Stearman 75) for comparison with Microraptor; in biplane aircraft of the 1920s, there was much additional drag generated by wires and struts between the two wings, such drag-induced structures were absent in Microraptor (Chatterjee and Templin 2007). Bottom, hypothetical flight path showing a typical undulating phugoid path from an initial take-off launch at a velocity of 3 meters per sec from a perch 20-m high and landing safely at a speed of about 6.4 meters per second (From: Chatterjee and Templin 2004).

Possible scenario for the development of feathers leading to the evolution of pennaceous feathers and flight. I and II, simple feathers possibly important for thermoregulation or display; III, with increasingly arboreal lifestyles, body feathers may have provided ancestors of birds with a more aerodynamic shape useful for leaping among branches; IV and V, simple pennaceous feather on the forelimbs may have allowed parachuting; VI, larger pennaceous feathers with symmetrical vanes may have permitted gliding; VII, asymmetrical feathers may have contributed to more efficient gliding; VIII, powered flight (From: Kurochkin and Bogdanovich 2008).

Current ideas about the evolution of feathers are based on dinosaurs (theropods) that actually lived well after Archaeopteryx. Steps in the evolution of bird feathers were likely similar to those in the evolution of feathers of non-avian theropods (Graphic source: PBS - NOVA).

A pre-Archaeopteryx troodontid theropod with feathers -- The early evolution of the major groups of derived non-avialan theropods is still not well understood, mainly because of their poor fossil record in the Jurassic. A well-known result of this problem is the ‘temporal paradox’ argument that is sometimes made against the theropod hypothesis of avian origins (i.e., how could birds evolve from theropods when the theropods seemingly most like those that gave rise to birds actually existed after birds evolved). Hu et al. (2009) report on an exceptionally well-preserved small theropod specimen collected from the earliest Late Jurassic Tiaojishan Formation (151 - 161 million years old) of western Liaoning, China. The specimen is referable to the Troodontidae, which are among the theropods most closely related to birds. This new find refutes the ‘temporal paradox’ because Anchiornis lived several million years before Archaeopteryx and provides significant information on the temporal framework of theropod divergence. Furthermore, the extensive feathering of this specimen, particularly the attachment of long pennaceous feathers to the pes (legs), sheds new light on the early evolution of feathers and demonstrates the complex distribution of skeletal and integumentary features close to the dinosaur–bird transition.

The long pennaceous leg feathers of Anchiornis, like those previously described for Microraptor and Pedopenna and Anchiornis, indicate that they served an aerodynamic function. This would imply that a four-winged condition played a role in the origin of avian flight and, because long feathers on the legs would likely impede terrestrial locomotion, also lends support to the arboreal hypothesis for the development of flight.

Calcott, B. 2009. Lineage explanations: explaining how biological mechanisms change. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60: 51-78.

Chatterjee, S., and R. J. Templin. 2004. Feathered coelurosaurs from China: new light on the arboreal origin of avian flight. In: Feathered dragons (P. J. Currie, E. B. Koppelhus, M. A. Shugar, and J. L. Wright, eds.), pp. 251-281. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN.

Chatterjee, S., and R. J. Templin. 2007. Biplane wing planform and flight performance of the feathered dinosaur Microraptor gui. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 104: 1576-1580.

Chen, P., Z. Dong, and S. Zhen. 1998. An exceptionally well-preserved theropod dinosaur from the Yixian Formation of China. Nature 391: 147-152.

Chuong, C. M., L. Hou, P. J. Chen, P. Wu, N. Patel, and Y. Chen. 2001. Dinosaur’s feather and chicken’s tooth? Tissue engineering of the integument. European Journal of Dermatology 11: 286-292.

Clarke, J., and K. Middleton. 2006. Bird evolution. Current Biology 16: R350-R354.

Delhey, K., M. Valcu, J. Dale, and B. Kempenaers. 2023. The evolution of carotenoid-based plumage colours in passerine birds. Journal of Animal Ecology 92: 66-77.

Dial, K. P. 2003. Wing-assisted incline running and the evolution of flight. Science 299: 402-404.

Kurochkin, E. N., and I. A. Bogdanovich. 2008. On the origin of avian flight: compromise and system approaches. Biology Bulletin 35: 1-11.

Lingham-Soliar, T., A. Feduccia, and X. Wang. 2007. A new Chinese specimen indicates that 'protofeathers' in the Early Cretaceous theropod dinosaur Sinosauropteryx are degraded collagen fibres. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 274: 1823-1829.

Lucas, A. M., and P. R. Stettenheim. 1972. Avian anatomy. Integument. Agriculture Handbook 362, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.

Mayr, E. 1960. The emergence of evolutionary novelties. In: The evolution of life (S. Tax, ed.), pp. 349-380. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

Norell, M. A., and X. Xu. 2005. Feathered dinosaurs. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 33: 277-299.

Padian, K. 2003. Four-winged dinosaurs, bird precursors, or neither? BioScience 53: 451-453.

Perrichot, V., L. Marion, D. Néraudeau, R. Vullo, and P. Tafforeau. 2008. The early evolution of feathers: fossil evidence from Cretaceous amber of France. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 275: 1197-1202.

Prum, R. O. 1999. Development and evolutionary origin of feathers. Journal of Experimental Zoology 285: 291-306.

Prum, R. O. 2005. Evolution of the morphological innovations of feathers. Journal of Experimental Zoology 304B: 570-579.

Prum, R. O., and A. H. Brush. 2002. The evolutionary origin and diversification of feathers. Quarterly Review of Biology 77: 261-295.

Prum, R. O., and A. H. Brush. 2003. Which came first, the feather or the bird? Scientific American 286: 84-93.

Prum, R. O., and S. Williamson. 2001. Theory of the growth and evolution of feather shape. Journal of Experimental Zoology 291: 30-57.

Qiang, J., P. J. Currie, M. A. Norell, and J. Shu-An. 1998. Two feathered dinosaurs from northeastern China. Nature 393: 753-761.

Regal, P. J. 1975. The evolutionary origin of feathers. Quarterly Review of Biology 50: 35-66.

Sawyer, R. H., T. Glenn, J. O. French, B. Mays, R. B. Shames, G. L. Barnes, Jr., W. Rhodes, and Y. Ishikawa. 2000. The expression of beta-keratins in the epidermal appendages of reptiles and birds. American Zoologist 40: 530-539.

Steiner, H. 1917. Das problem der diastataxie des vogelflügels. Jenaische Zeitschrift für Naturwissenschaft 55: 222-496.

True, J. R., and S. B. Carroll. 2002. Gene co-option in physiological and morphological evolution. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 18: 53-80.

Unwin, D. M. 1998. Feathers, filaments and theropod dinosaurs. Nature 391: 119-120.

Xu, X., X. Zheng, and H. You. 2009. A new feather type in a nonavian theropod and the early evolution of feathers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 106: 832-834.

Xu, X., Z. Zhou, and R. O. Prum. 2001. Branched integumentary structures in Sinornithosaurus and the origin of feathers. Nature 410: 200-204.

Xu, X., Z. Zhou, X. Wang, X. Kuang, F. Zhang, and X. Du. 2003. Four-winged dinosaurs from China. Nature 421: 335-340.

Zhang, F., Z. Zhou, X. Xu, X. Wang, and C. Sullivan. 2008. A bizarre Jurassic maniraptoran from China with elongate ribbon-like feathers. Nature 455: 1105-1108.

Zhou, Z., P. M. Barrett, and J. Hilton. 2003. An exceptionally preserved Lower Cretaceous ecosystem. Nature 421: 807-814.